Evaluate the work education sub-program (arts and crafts) of the resident students of O.S.P.A. U.E., “Santa Rosa De Lima” School, Municipality A.E.B -Sanare- Edo Lara
Keywords:
Resources, action, didactics, evaluation, productsAbstract
The following research evaluated the working education subprogram taking into account Arts and Trades taught to the resident students of OSPA in the Unidad Educativa “Santa Rosa de Lima, placed in Sanare Village, Andrés Eloy Blanco Council, in Lara State. This evaluation obtained information to be used by the school to improve such a program. The research was done under an evaluative description designed as an expofacto system. It was applied to the complete program (universal population) through an observation guide and interviews which permitted evaluate inputs, process, and products. Evidences were found about structure, equipments, materials, and all the resources needed to teach the area. All of this was acquired for the nuns called “Hijas de la Caridad”. Talking about didactic strategies, it is possible to say there are a diversity of them used with a high property although time is not enough. Finally, it is a series of recommendations.
References
Adam, Félix. (1977). Andragogía. Ciencia de la Educación de Adultos. Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez. Publicaciones de la Presidencia. (2da. Edición). Caracas, Venezuela.
Arias, Fidias G. Marzo de 1997, El Proyecto De Investigación. Introducción a la metodología científica, Caracas-Venezuela, editorial Episteme, C.A. Páginas (74 -79)
Díaz B., F. y Hernández R., G. (1999). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje Significativo. McGraw Hill, México, 232p
Hurtado, J. (1998). Metodología de la Investigación Holística. Caracas: Sypal- Fundacite
LOE. (2009). Ley Orgánica de Educación. Venezuela
Proyecto OSPA Casa Hogar Santa Rosa de Lima (2006) Sanare.
Programa Nacional Red Casa Hogar Avec (2004). Conformación de Red Casa- Hogar en Venezuela. Asociación Venezolana de Educación Católica
Stufflebeam, D.L. y Shinkfield, A.J. (1987).Evaluación sistemática. Guía teórica y práctica. Madrid: Paidós-MEC.
Stufflebeam, D.L. The CIPP Model for evaluation. Annual Conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network, 2003.Disponible en: www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cippchecklist.htm
Tamayo T, M. (1998). El Proceso de la Investigación Científica. 3ª ed. México: Editorial Limusa, S.A. de C.V
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Sustentabilidad al dia
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.